What the Changes Could Mean for Employers, Skilled Migrants and Families
18 September 2026
The Australian Government has announced the next stage of significant reforms to Australia’s migration program, with changes affecting skilled migration, visitor visas, international students, Working Holiday Makers, family migration pathways and migration compliance.
The Government has stated that these reforms are intended to deliver a more targeted migration system while reducing Net Overseas Migration (NOM) to the Budget forecasts of 245,000 in the current financial year and 225,000 in 2027–28.
The changes will not all take effect immediately. Some have already begun, while others are expected to be progressively implemented over the next 12 months.
For businesses, visa applicants and Australian families, however, the direction of Government policy is becoming increasingly clear: migration will continue to play an important role in Australia, but access to the migration program is becoming more targeted and controlled.
What has the Government announced?
The Government’s latest migration package includes:
- changes to skilled visa processing priorities under Ministerial Direction 119;
- further reform of Australia’s skilled migration settings;
- the introduction of a No Further Stay condition on all future visitor visas;
- measures designed to prevent “visa hopping” within the student visa program;
- restrictions on secondary applicants for most student visas;
- changes to the Working Holiday Maker program, including ballots for second and third visas;
- stronger immigration compliance and enforcement;
- increased action against migration agents knowingly supporting applications without merit; and
- changes to Ministerial Direction 110 relating to character and community protection.
There are some positive elements within the announcement, particularly the Government’s recognition that skilled migration processing needs to better respond to areas of genuine workforce demand.
However, from our perspective as migration professionals working extensively with Australian employers and families, there are also some significant practical issues that need to be addressed as these reforms are implemented.
Skilled migration and Ministerial Direction 119
Ministerial Direction 119 commenced on 25 July 2026 and changed the way a range of skilled visa applications are prioritised for processing.
Importantly, the Direction applies to the Skills in Demand subclass 482 visa, as well as permanent employer-sponsored and other skilled visas including subclasses 186, 189, 190, 191, 491 and 494.
Under the current Direction, priority is determined substantially by the applicant’s occupation and whether the applicant is already in Australia.
The highest priorities currently apply to occupations supporting Australia’s law enforcement and defence interests, followed by construction, healthcare and teaching occupations. Onshore applicants are also generally given priority over comparable offshore applicants.
The Government has now announced that Direction 119 will be updated again, with priority processing expanded across a broader range of sectors including:
healthcare, construction, education, law enforcement, defence, resources, agriculture, aquaculture and fishing.
We welcome any changes that improve processing for industries experiencing genuine skills shortages. There is, however, a broader issue that needs to be considered.
Are lengthy subclass 482 processing times sustainable for Australian businesses?
We are already experiencing the practical consequences of the current processing priority framework across Skills in Demand subclass 482 applications.
Although accredited sponsors continue to receive priority processing according to Departmental policy, Direction 119 now imposes a broader priority structure based upon occupation and applicant location.
This means businesses outside the Government’s identified priority sectors can potentially face considerably longer processing periods.
The Department’s published median processing time for temporary skilled visas was 98 days for July 2026, but this is a broad category figure and does not necessarily reflect the experience of individual subclass 482 Core Skills applications. Depending upon the occupation, priority category and circumstances of the application, processing can take considerably longer. Currently, the core stream processing time indicates 50% processed by 4 months, 90% by 10 months.
This creates a genuine commercial problem. In our experience, most Australian employers do not turn to overseas recruitment as their first option.
Sponsoring an overseas worker involves substantial cost, administration, Labour Market Testing and immigration compliance obligations. Businesses generally use the subclass 482 program because they have an identified position that they have been unable to fill appropriately within the Australian labour market.
Once an employer has demonstrated that genuine need, it is difficult to reconcile that need with a visa processing system under which a critical employee may not be able to commence work for many months.
A position that a business needs filled today cannot necessarily remain vacant indefinitely.
We therefore welcome the Government’s decision to broaden the occupations receiving priority under Direction 119. However, we would also encourage the Government to consider how reasonable processing times can be maintained for all genuine employer-sponsored applications, not simply occupations falling within selected priority sectors.
Australia needs a skilled migration system that protects Australian employment while also recognising that businesses need certainty and commercially realistic timeframes when local recruitment has been unsuccessful.
Changes to Visitor Visas – and the potential impact on Australian families
One of the most significant announcements, and personally one of the areas that concerns me most, is the Government’s proposal to impose a No Further Stay condition on all future visitor visas.
A No Further Stay condition – Condition 8503 – prevents a visa holder from applying for many other substantive visas while they remain in Australia, unless the condition can be waived in limited circumstances.
The Government’s stated intention is clear: visitor visas should be used for genuine temporary visits and should not become a mechanism for extending a person’s stay in Australia through subsequent onshore visa applications.
From an immigration integrity perspective, the reasoning is understandable. However, there is another side to this policy that deserves careful consideration: Australian families.
Partner visas and the human impact
Many of our clients have historically used a visitor visa legitimately to spend time with their Australian partner or family in Australia before subsequently lodging an eligible onshore Partner visa. The introduction of a No Further Stay condition across all future visitor visas would fundamentally change the availability of that pathway. This is particularly significant when considered alongside the current processing arrangements for Partner visas.
As at July 2026, the Department reports a median processing period of approximately 23 months for provisional and temporary Partner visas.
Furthermore, under Ministerial Direction 117, onshore Partner visa applications are currently afforded higher processing priority than offshore Partner visa applications such as the subclass 309/100 pathway.
The Government has indicated that people awaiting offshore Partner visa decisions will still be able to visit their partners in Australia, subject of course to satisfying the requirements for a visitor visa. That is positive, howeve, visiting your husband, wife or partner is not the same thing as being able to establish your life together in Australia while waiting for a Partner visa decision.
If the practical consequence of the visitor visa reforms is that more couples must rely upon offshore Partner visa pathways, then we need to consider whether the existing processing framework is equipped to deal with that change.
Two years – and potentially considerably longer for some applications – is a significant period in the life of a family.
It can affect employment, housing, children, caring responsibilities and the simple ability of couples to establish a normal life together.
If the Government intends to substantially restrict the ability of visitors to transition to eligible onshore family visa pathways, I would strongly encourage it to simultaneously examine offshore Partner visa processing times and priorities. Migration integrity is important. But so is the human element of migration.
What about Parent visas?
The visitor visa changes may also have consequences for families considering Parent visa pathways.
Parent migration is already one of the most complex areas of Australia’s family migration program, particularly because a number of Parent visa categories are subject to annual caps, queues and lengthy processing periods. The contributory parent visa that once had visa grants within a few years, is now upwards of 15 years in processing. The Age Parent Visa is beyond 30 years and realistically is not viable for many applicants.
Historically, the ability of parents to visit family in Australia while considering or progressing longer-term migration options has been an important part of family migration planning.
The Government will therefore need to provide much greater detail about how universal No Further Stay conditions will interact with the different Parent visa pathways and the circumstances in which waivers may remain available.
This is an area we will be watching particularly closely as the legislation and policy settings become clearer.
Student visa changes
The Government has also announced further measures designed to strengthen the integrity of the international student program.
These include measures intended to prevent students continually moving between visas or courses simply to extend their stay in Australia, together with restrictions on secondary applicants for most student visas.
These reforms continue the Government’s broader policy of repositioning the Student visa as primarily an education pathway rather than a mechanism for maintaining long-term residence in Australia.
For prospective students, course selection, educational progression and longer-term immigration planning will therefore become increasingly important.
Working Holiday Maker reforms
Further changes are also proposed for the Working Holiday Maker program.
The Government intends to introduce a ballot system for second and third Working Holiday Maker visas, together with regional work requirements designed to continue supporting regional Australia.
The Government has also stated that it intends to stabilise Working Holiday Maker processing times at approximately three months.
Further detail will be required before the full implications of these changes can be assessed.
UK citizens will be exempt from the changes for the 2nd and 3rd year ballot system based on the UK and Australia Free Trade Agreement.
Increased immigration compliance
Another clear theme running through the announcement is enforcement.
The Government intends to strengthen measures to ensure people without valid visas leave Australia and to take stronger action against migration agents who knowingly support visa applications without merit.
There is nothing controversial about maintaining the integrity of Australia’s migration system.
Applicants should lodge genuine applications, sponsors must comply with their sponsorship obligations and registered migration professionals have an important responsibility to ensure clients receive proper advice about their prospects and obligations.
However, compliance measures work best when they sit alongside a migration system that is also predictable, transparent and capable of making decisions within reasonable timeframes.
Where is Australian migration policy heading?
The Government’s direction is becoming increasingly apparent – Australia is not closing the door to migration.
Instead, the Government is seeking greater control over who comes to Australia, why they come, how long they remain and whether their skills align with Australia’s identified economic priorities.
For employers, this means workforce planning and sponsorship strategy will become increasingly important.
For temporary visa holders, moving from one visa to another simply to extend time in Australia is likely to become progressively more difficult.
For prospective skilled migrants, occupation, sector and whether an application is lodged onshore or offshore may have an increasingly significant impact on processing.
And for families, particularly Australian citizens and permanent residents with partners or parents overseas, the interaction between visitor visa restrictions and family migration processing will need to be watched very carefully.
Our view
There are elements of these reforms that make sense. Australia needs a migration system with integrity. It should respond to genuine workforce shortages, protect the Australian labour market and prevent misuse of temporary visa programs.
But migration policy also needs to work in the real world.
Australian businesses cannot always wait many months for an employee whom they have already demonstrated they genuinely need.
Australian citizens should not face unnecessary prolonged separation from their partners because the interaction between visitor visa restrictions and offshore Partner visa processing has not been adequately addressed.
As the Government progressively implements these measures over the next 12 months, the detail will matter enormously.
We will continue to monitor the implementation of these reforms closely, particularly the revised Ministerial Direction 119, changes to visitor visa conditions and their impact on employer-sponsored and family migration pathways.
As always, our focus will be on helping businesses and individuals understand not simply what has changed, but what those changes mean in practice.
MARN 1386281